Re: snapbuild woes

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: snapbuild woes
Date: 2017-04-08 14:32:10
Message-ID: 935b0161-8ca1-fc38-3d30-7d0e67ed1376@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/8/17 10:29 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2017-04-08 15:56, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2017-04-08 09:51:39 -0400, David Steele wrote:
>>> On 3/2/17 7:54 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Yes the copy patch needs rebase as well. But these ones are fine.
>>>
>>> This bug has been moved to CF 2017-07.
>>
>> FWIW, as these are bug-fixes that need to be backpatched, I do plan to
>> work on them soon.
>>
>
> CF 2017-07 pertains to postgres 11, is that right?

In general, yes, but bugs will always be fixed as needed. It doesn't
matter what CF they are in.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-04-08 14:34:16 Re: 2017-03 CF Closed
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-04-08 14:30:59 Re: snapbuild woes