Re: better atomics - v0.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: better atomics - v0.2
Date: 2013-11-19 15:37:35
Message-ID: 9336.1384875455@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The only animal we have that doesn't support quiet inlines today is
> HP-UX/ac++, and I think - as in patch 1 in the series - we might be able
> to simply suppress the warning there.

Or just not worry about it, if it's only a warning? Or does the warning
mean code bloat (lots of useless copies of the inline function)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-11-19 15:40:43 Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-11-19 15:34:59 Re: better atomics - v0.2