From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments |
Date: | 2021-06-03 20:50:35 |
Message-ID: | 93343.1622753435@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Not sure I follow the "other datatypes" bit. Are you saying the spec
> won't let you have this?:
> create procedure divide(x int, y int, OUT q int);
> create procedure divide(x int, y int, OUT q float);
In fact it won't, because the spec's rule is simply "you can't have
two procedures with the same name and same number of parameters"
(where they count OUT parameters, I believe). However the case
I was considering was wanting to have
create procedure divide(x int, y int, OUT q int) ...
create procedure divide(x numeric, y numeric, OUT q numeric) ...
which likewise falls foul of the spec's restriction, but which
IMO must be allowed in Postgres.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhihong Yu | 2021-06-03 20:50:46 | Re: PATCH: generate fractional cheapest paths in generate_orderedappend_path |
Previous Message | David Christensen | 2021-06-03 20:49:15 | DELETE CASCADE |