| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
| Date: | 2020-09-14 02:48:51 |
| Message-ID: | 933062.1600051731@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> * Starting over, it appears that 001_rep_changes.pl almost immediately
> gets into an infinite loop. It does not complete the third test step,
> rather infinitely waiting for progress to be made.
Ah, looking closer, the problem is that wal_receiver_timeout = 60s
is too short when the sender is using CCA. It times out before we
can get through the needed data transmission.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-09-14 03:18:32 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-09-14 02:28:21 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |