Re: TOAST and TEXT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TOAST and TEXT
Date: 2001-10-11 04:32:47
Message-ID: 9327.1002774767@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> writes:
> ... I don't
> like the old large object implementation, I need to store very large
> numbers of objects and unless this implementation has changed
> in recent times it won't cut it.

Have you looked at 7.1? AFAIK it has no particular problem with
lots of LOs.

Which is not to discourage you from going over to bytea fields instead,
if that model happens to be more convenient for your application.
But your premise above seems false.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-10-11 04:45:59 Re: pg_dump oid problems
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-10-11 01:27:48 Re: iso-8859-15/16 to MULE