Re: remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code
Date: 2018-09-01 04:51:31
Message-ID: 92fe6039-16ea-483a-2cf9-ea58955006ab@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 31/08/2018 10:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 16/08/2018 16:10, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> If I had my druthers, we'd just remove all that configure magic for
>>>> selecting these files and just use ifdefs. Personally I find it
>>>> occasionally that they're linked into place, rather than built under
>>>> their original name.
>>>
>>> Even if we all agreed that was an improvement (which I'm not sure of),
>>> it wouldn't fix this problem would it? On affected platforms, the
>>> file would still be empty after preprocessing.
>>
>> Well, that depends on what you put into that file, it seems
>> realistically combinable with a bunch of non-conditional code...
>
> How about this: We only have two nonstandard dlopen() implementations
> left: Windows and (old) HP-UX. We move those into src/port/dlopen.c and
> treat it like a regular libpgport member. That gets rid of all those
> duplicative empty per-platform files.

Updated patch. It needed some adjustments for Windows, per Appveyor,

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Refactor-dlopen-support.patch text/plain 39.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2018-09-01 04:58:21 Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes
Previous Message Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan GCS Delivery) 2018-09-01 04:33:18 RE: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module