Re: How to get schema name which violates fk constraint

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrus <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to get schema name which violates fk constraint
Date: 2008-10-22 17:27:58
Message-ID: 9293.1224696478@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribi:
>> In the second place, the reason most of our messages don't already
>> contain schema names is that in the past we've judged it would be
>> mostly clutter; and given the infrequency of complaints I see no
>> reason to change that opinion.

> I tend to disagree. We can run a poll in a wider audience.

We already have a large poll: divide the number of complaints on this
topic since 7.3 came out by the number of users ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2008-10-22 17:34:12 Re: How to get schema name which violates fk constraint
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-10-22 17:14:43 Re: How to get schema name which violates fk constraint