From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 13 Release Timeline |
Date: | 2020-09-24 14:14:12 |
Message-ID: | 928fcaf1-c3e9-9fa2-68db-b81b1c04ef58@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/24/20 10:11 AM, James Coleman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:30 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> I am pleased to report that PostgreSQL 13 is now GA:
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/2077/
>
> I'm not sure if there was a "release announcement draft" thread
> (searching my folder didn't find one for GA, but it's also easily
> possible I missed it)
Yes, there always is[1]
: I'm wondering if the link for incremental sort
> [1] should instead/also point to the examples in [2] which actually
> explain what incremental sort does.
>
>
> Actually, should the GUC page link there? There's not an obvious
> anchor tag on the page (that I can tell) to use for such a link
> though...
When researching it, I believe I chose the GUC because it was anchorable.
> If it'd be better to split off this to a new thread, I can do that too.
Probably, because it will trigger discussion ;)
Jonathan
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/dfc987e3-bb8c-96f5-3bd2-11b9dcc96f19%40postgresql.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2020-09-24 14:21:24 | Re: scram-sha-256 broken with FIPS and OpenSSL 1.0.2 |
Previous Message | James Coleman | 2020-09-24 14:11:45 | Re: PostgreSQL 13 Release Timeline |