Re: First-draft release notes for next week's releases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First-draft release notes for next week's releases
Date: 2019-02-09 02:00:08
Message-ID: 926.1549677608@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> Note that "Fix deadlock in GIN vacuum introduced by 218f51584d5"
> (which is commit fd83c83d on the master branch) is not that far from
> being a complete revert of a v10 feature (this appears as "Reduce page
> locking during vacuuming of GIN indexes" in the v10 release notes).

Yeah, I saw that in the commit message, but didn't really think that
the release note entry needed to explain it that way. Could be
argued differently though.

> We may even need to revise the v10 release notes.

Perhaps just remove that item from the 10.0 notes?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-02-09 02:10:02 Re: First-draft release notes for next week's releases
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-02-09 01:57:01 Re: First-draft release notes for next week's releases