Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: "Billy G(dot) Allie" <Bill(dot)Allie(at)mug(dot)org>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.
Date: 2002-11-07 07:42:47
Message-ID: 9258.1036654967@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> I don't believe your changes are necessary.

The static-inline change was obsoleted by a recent fix, per discussion.
But the rpath changes seem possibly useful (or maybe my thoughts are
just colored by the fact that I'm currently trying to persuade OpenSSL
to build with a non-broken rpath setup on HPUX...) Do you have an
objection to the rpath part of Billy's patch?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleus Mantzios 2002-11-07 07:57:20 Re: [SQL] Problem: Referential Integrity Constraints lost
Previous Message Achilleus Mantzios 2002-11-07 07:33:21 Re: [SQL] Problem: Referential Integrity Constraints lost

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Olivier PRENANT 2002-11-07 12:32:18 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
Previous Message mathan 2002-11-07 07:04:09 Make 7.1.3under HP-UX 11.22