Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
Date: 2015-09-29 22:19:49
Message-ID: 9243.1443565189@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Give me source with the change, and I'll put it on a cheap, low-bandwith
>> AWS instance and hammer the heck out of it. That should raise any false
>> positives we can expect.

> Here's a draft patch against HEAD (looks like it will work on 9.5 or
> 9.4 without modifications, too).

BTW: in addition to whatever AWS testing Josh has in mind, it'd be good if
someone tried it on Windows. AFAIK, the self-kill() should work in the
postmaster on Windows, but that should be checked. Also, does the set of
errnos it checks cover typical deletion cases on Windows? Try both
removal of $PGDATA in toto and removal of just pg_control or just global/.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouhei Kaigai 2015-09-29 22:19:50 Re: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c
Previous Message David Rowley 2015-09-29 22:18:20 Re: PATCH: use foreign keys to improve join estimates v1