Re: SQL-standard function body

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Date: 2021-04-18 19:08:44
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> Should we be okay releasing v14 without support for breaking function
> dependency loops, or does that call for an open item?

Oh! That should definitely be an open item. It doesn't seem
that hard to do something similar to what we do for views,
i.e. create a dummy function and replace it later.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-04-18 19:18:33 Re: More info on pg_stat_activity Wait Event Name when is DataFileRead
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2021-04-18 18:58:53 Planning time grows exponentially with levels of nested views