Re: [PATCH] Clarify wording for convalidated in pg_constraint.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jimmy Angelakos <jimmy(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify wording for convalidated in pg_constraint.
Date: 2020-10-30 14:39:31
Message-ID: 92141.1604068771@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jimmy Angelakos <jimmy(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Please find attached my first patch (the tiniest of doc patches) :
> I found the wording around convalidated in pg_catalog documentation a bit
> confusing/ambiguous.

Seems reasonable; pushed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Georgios Kokolatos 2020-10-30 15:00:55 Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Previous Message Jimmy Angelakos 2020-10-30 13:47:04 [PATCH] Clarify wording for convalidated in pg_constraint.