| From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now |
| Date: | 2022-07-16 00:28:06 |
| Message-ID: | 9201c9c7-029a-8061-9a35-9870e4b3fc16@timescale.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/15/22 16:51, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'd make it dependent on whether there have been previous rounds of feedback
> or not. If somebody spent a good amount of time reviewing a patch previously,
> but then didn't review the newest version in the last few weeks, it doesn't
> seem useful to remove them from the CF entry. The situation is different if
> somebody has signed up but not done much.
If someone put a lot of review into a patchset a few months ago, they
absolutely deserve credit. But if that entry has been sitting with no
feedback this month, why is it useful to keep that Reviewer around?
(We may want to join this with the other thread.)
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2022-07-16 00:38:24 | Re: Select Reference Page - Make Join Syntax More Prominent |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-07-16 00:25:00 | Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change |