| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: GIN predicate locking slows down valgrind isolationtests tremendously |
| Date: | 2018-12-24 22:47:57 |
| Message-ID: | 91dd006e-1183-8ea7-b6b7-cc19ed0a6ed4@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/24/18 5:25 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 1:50 AM Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> чт, 20 дек. 2018 г., 2:22 Andres Freund andres(at)anarazel(dot)de:
>>> On 2018-12-03 16:07:40 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> As far as I can tell that increase comes laregely from the new GIN
>>>> tests. Could one of you please look at keeping the test time increase
>>>> to something more reasonable?
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>> It's also one of the slowest tests outside of valgrind...
>> I'm going to take a look on that.
> BTW, patch for reducing isolation testing for gin predicate locking is
> attached. Could anybody check its execution time with valgrind (and
> compare with execution time of previous test suite)?
Will try if I get some time to spare in the next 72 hours or so
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-12-24 22:58:08 | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-12-24 22:25:57 | Re: GIN predicate locking slows down valgrind isolationtests tremendously |