Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FunctionCallN improvement.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: a_ogawa <a_ogawa(at)hi-ho(dot)ne(dot)jp>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FunctionCallN improvement.
Date: 2005-02-02 22:46:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
a_ogawa <a_ogawa(at)hi-ho(dot)ne(dot)jp> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Based on this I think we ought to go with the "unrolled" approach,

> I agree. The unrolled approach is a good result in most environments. 

I have committed changes along this line in HEAD and 8_0 branches.

> First of all, this macro will be applied only to fmgr.c, but I think 
> we better define it in fmgr.h. 

For the moment I just put it in fmgr.c to have a minimally invasive
patch.  We can make it globally available if there's evidence it's
needed elsewhere.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-02-02 23:46:11
Subject: Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2005-02-02 22:20:48
Subject: Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group