Re: FunctionCallN improvement.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: a_ogawa <a_ogawa(at)hi-ho(dot)ne(dot)jp>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FunctionCallN improvement.
Date: 2005-02-02 22:46:12
Message-ID: 9191.1107384372@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

a_ogawa <a_ogawa(at)hi-ho(dot)ne(dot)jp> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Based on this I think we ought to go with the "unrolled" approach,

> I agree. The unrolled approach is a good result in most environments.

I have committed changes along this line in HEAD and 8_0 branches.

> First of all, this macro will be applied only to fmgr.c, but I think
> we better define it in fmgr.h.

For the moment I just put it in fmgr.c to have a minimally invasive
patch. We can make it globally available if there's evidence it's
needed elsewhere.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-02-02 23:46:11 Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-02-02 22:20:48 Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0