Re: OS/400 support?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OS/400 support?
Date: 2003-01-07 02:51:14
Message-ID: 9157.1041907874@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> It might be pretty simple given PASE support and a hardware/OS manual. The
> problem is that first assumption: how many OS/400 users have PASE
> implemented? I'd say, not many.

It says here:
http://www-919.ibm.com/developer/factory/pase/v5r2.html

that PASE is standard as of OS/400 V5R2. Anyone know how old that is?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-07 03:00:23 Re: OS/400 support?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-01-07 02:01:43 Thank-you to Cybertec Geschwinde & Schonig