Re: Re: [PATCH] regexp_positions ( string text, pattern text, flags text ) → setof int4range[]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
Cc: "Mark Dilger" <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Postgres hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andreas Karlsson" <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] regexp_positions ( string text, pattern text, flags text ) → setof int4range[]
Date: 2021-03-02 05:31:46
Message-ID: 910439.1614663106@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> writes:
> Unless fixed, then the way I see it, I don't think we can use int4range[] for regexp_positions(),

Yeah. It's a cute idea, but the semantics aren't quite right.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-03-02 05:34:40 Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-03-02 05:28:21 Re: repeated decoding of prepared transactions