| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Kelly Burkhart" <kelly(dot)burkhart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Evgeny Gridasov" <eugrid(at)fpm(dot)kubsu(dot)ru>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] EXPLAIN ANALYZE on 8.2 |
| Date: | 2006-12-15 15:45:56 |
| Message-ID: | 9096.1166197556@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> There are various attempts at providing better timing infrastructure at low
> overhead but I'm not sure what's out there currently. I expect to do this what
> we'll have to do is invent a pg_* abstraction that has various implementations
> on different architectures.
You've got to be kidding. Surely it's glibc's responsibility, not ours,
to implement gettimeofday correctly for the hardware.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-12-15 15:48:45 | Re: [HACKERS] EXPLAIN ANALYZE on 8.2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-15 15:20:44 | Re: unixware and --with-ldap |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-12-15 15:48:45 | Re: [HACKERS] EXPLAIN ANALYZE on 8.2 |
| Previous Message | Ron | 2006-12-15 15:04:58 | Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations |