Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
Date: 2020-04-10 19:29:34
Message-ID: 907cfa80-9879-2c71-b4d5-ba3ba6d5512e@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/10/20 3:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
>> Having said that, I'm +1 on verify.
>
> Me too, if only because it's shorter.

I also think it is (probably) more correct but failing that it is
*definitely* shorter!

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-04-10 19:33:01 Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-10 19:27:05 Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?