Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands
Date: 2017-05-11 03:53:27
Message-ID: 90729D71-F0AD-4560-9026-13ECFF09529B@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/10/17, 8:10 PM, "Masahiko Sawada" <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree to report per-table information. Especially In case of one of
> tables specified failed during vacuuming, I think we should report at
> least information of tables that is done successfully so far.

+1

I believe you already get all per-table information when you do not specify a table name (“VACUUM VERBOSE;”), so I would expect to get this for free as long as we are building this into the existing ExecVacuum(…) and vacuum(…) functions.

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-05-11 04:03:23 Re: SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-05-11 03:10:15 Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands