Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Date: 2012-07-03 16:18:47
Message-ID: 9070.1341332327@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Yeah, I'm of two minds on that. I thought that it made sense to use
> integer identifiers internally for speed, but now I'm worried that the
> effort to translate back and forth between strings and integers is
> going to end up being more than any speed we might save.

We do that for nodetags in stored query/expression trees, and I've never
seen any indication that it costs enough to notice. It's definitely a
huge win for anything that changes regularly, which seems like it'll be
a pretty good description of event tags for at least the next few years.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-07-03 16:25:57 Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-07-03 16:12:31 Re: [WIP] Patch : Change pg_ident.conf parsing to be the same as pg_hba.conf