| From: | "Arnaud L(dot)" <arnaud(dot)listes(at)codata(dot)eu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber |
| Date: | 2020-01-20 07:33:22 |
| Message-ID: | 90692235-bb8b-9261-c55d-15f096b13799@codata.eu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Le 17/01/2020 à 19:07, Laurenz Albe a écrit :
> On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 08:43 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote:
>> > > is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the
>> > > logical replication ?
>> >
>> > Yes, if you don't want physical backups.
>>
>> You mean online physical backups ?
>> I could still shutdown the subscriber and take an offline physical
>> backup, right ?
>
> Yes, that is what I mean.
Great. Thanks Laurenz !
Regards
--
Arnaud
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ekaterina Amez | 2020-01-20 13:59:13 | Questions about how to streaming replication (pg 9.2) |
| Previous Message | Ramesh Penuballi | 2020-01-20 06:00:04 | Re: postgresql commands(psql,createdb,dropdb) are not working from shell script |