Re: valgrind issues on Fedora 28

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: valgrind issues on Fedora 28
Date: 2018-11-17 23:11:54
Message-ID: 9063c043-83cd-b439-a928-622a743edd2c@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/8/18 1:07 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 11/6/18 6:51 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 11/6/18 6:35 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> On 2018-Nov-06, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've recently updated to Fedora 28, and in that environment I get
>>>> quite a
>>>> few new valgrind issues (see the attached log).
>>>
>>> Hmm, related to
>>> https://postgr.es/m/20180220150838.GD18315@e733.localdomain ?
>>> Apparently the right answer is to add local suppressions ...
>>>
>>
>> Yep, seems like that. I'll check if the patch proposed by Aleksander
>> resolves all the issues reported by valgrind.
>>
>
> OK, I propose we add suppressions per the attached patch.
>
> The rules are clearly incomplete, due to dependence on optimization
> used. For example now the stack includes __wcsnlen_avx2, but I see it
> was __wcsnlen_sse4_1 in Aleksander's report in February.
>
> Not sure what to do about this - maybe we should wildcard this first
> frame, to accept all wcsnlen variants. Opinions?
>

I've committed this with the first frame wirldcarded, and backpatched it
all the way back to 9.4.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-11-17 23:27:07 Re: Index Skip Scan
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2018-11-17 21:15:08 Re: Support custom socket directory in pg_upgrade