Re: location of Unix socket

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: location of Unix socket
Date: 2000-11-30 18:07:53
Message-ID: 9042.975607673@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I'm going to disable the URL patch, since it doesn't seem to work and
> breaks legitimate uses of database names with funny characters. The
> service patch seemed kind of useful, but since it's not documented and I
> don't feel like finding out, I think we can let it go the SSL way, i.e.,
> sort out for next release.

Sounds like a plan. The service patch at least doesn't look like it
will cause surprises for anyone who doesn't know about it ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitch Vincent 2000-11-30 19:17:28 Re: Size of my data base?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-11-30 18:05:09 Re: location of Unix socket