From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | "Jon Jensen" <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Status report: regex replacement |
Date: | 2003-02-06 04:07:52 |
Message-ID: | 9042.1044504472@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> You want regex_flavour? ;-)
> Hehe - yeah I don't really care. I have to use 'color' often enough
> accessing 100% of the world's programming APIs...
> How about regex_type, regex_mode, regex_option, etc.? ;)
Well, I used "flavor" in my previous message because Friedl uses that
term consistently in his book to refer to the various idiosyncracies
of different regex implementations. It seems like a good term to me;
the differences among them don't rise to the level of being different
languages, yet they're distinctly different.
type, mode, option all seem, um, colourless ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-06 05:30:03 | Re: databases limit |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-06 03:59:35 | Re: Status report: regex replacement |