Re: Transaction eating up all RAM

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Peter" <peter(at)greatnowhere(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Transaction eating up all RAM
Date: 2006-03-13 18:44:59
Message-ID: 9033.1142275499@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Peter" <peter(at)greatnowhere(dot)com> writes:
> I have no triggers defined on any of the tables, and no foreign keys that
> could cause cascaded updates and stuff. Care to see full text of the proc?
> It's pl/PgPerlU

If there's no triggers involved then it sounds like a memory leak. What
PG version is this? If it's current then we'd like a test case, yes.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-13 18:49:18 Re: ERROR: FULL JOIN is only supported with merge-joinable
Previous Message Greg Stark 2006-03-13 18:35:44 Re: Wal -long transaction

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2006-03-13 18:49:45 Re: [PERFORM] Hanging queries on dual CPU windows
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-03-13 18:37:14 Re: Restoring a Full Cluster on a Different Architecture (32 x 64)