Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Date: 2020-03-10 14:07:02
Message-ID: 902d1219-3522-a4dd-544a-86af396f2c2d@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/10/20 9:00 AM, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 9:33 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
> <mailto:david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>> wrote:
>
> The patch is not exactly new for this CF but since the first version
> was
> posted 2020-01-01 and there have been no updates (except a rebase)
> since
> then it comes pretty close.
>
> Were you planning to work on this for PG13?  If so we'll need to see a
> rebased and updated patch pretty soon.  My recommendation is that we
> move this patch to PG14.
>
> I agree with moving to  PG14 . Its hard to make it to PG13.

The target version is now PG14.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-10 14:41:20 Re: time for catalog/pg_cast.c?
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-03-10 13:53:36 Re: Add an optional timeout clause to isolationtester step.