Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Date: 2010-11-13 03:55:54
Message-ID: 9022.1289620554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> FYI, I always wondered if the rare use of mergejoins justified the extra
> planning time of carrying around all those joinpaths.

They're hardly rare.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-11-13 04:09:06 Re: max_wal_senders must die
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-11-13 03:47:02 Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...