Re: PoC/WIP: Extended statistics on expressions

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PoC/WIP: Extended statistics on expressions
Date: 2021-01-22 13:06:51
Message-ID: 901b9cf3-78f3-9cc4-94a6-8ab4dfa5f34b@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/22/21 10:00 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 04:46, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I think you'll maybe have to do something better - this seems a bit too weird:
>>
>> | postgres=# CREATE STATISTICS s2 ON (i+1) ,i FROM t;
>> | postgres=# \d t
>> | ...
>> | "public"."s2" (ndistinct, dependencies, mcv) ON i FROM t
>>
>
> I guess that's not surprising, given that old psql knows nothing about
> expressions in stats.
>
> In general, I think connecting old versions of psql to newer servers
> is not supported. You're lucky if \d works at all. So it shouldn't be
> this patch's responsibility to make that output nicer.
>

Yeah. It's not clear to me what exactly could we do with this, without
"backpatching" the old psql or making the ruleutils.c consider version
of the psql. Neither of these seems possible/acceptable.

I'm sure this is not the only place showing "incomplete" information in
old psql on new server.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-01-22 13:09:04 Re: PoC/WIP: Extended statistics on expressions
Previous Message Masahiro Ikeda 2021-01-22 13:05:24 Re: About to add WAL write/fsync statistics to pg_stat_wal view