Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer
Date: 2003-08-17 04:57:01
Message-ID: 9003.1061096221@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> There's a date + integer operator, but no integer + date operator.
>> Yawn...

> Uh, "Yawn" means we don't need to fix it, or "oh, here's another one"?

It means "I can't get excited about it." The docs don't claim that we
have such an operator (do they?) and I see no clear advantage to adding
one.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-17 05:09:13 Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-17 04:53:58 Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer