Re: [PATCH] Clarify that ssl_groups is for any key exchange groups

From: "Si, Evan" <evansi(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: surya poondla <suryapoondla4(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ewan Young <kdbase(dot)hack(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "Si, Evan" <evsi(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify that ssl_groups is for any key exchange groups
Date: 2026-08-29 19:52:59
Message-ID: 8f2d8485-2a29-42af-a981-5c6ef48b4801@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 8/27/26 12:23 PM, surya poondla wrote:
> Thank you for the patch. I was reviewing this as part of the commitfest for
> v20.
Thanks for the review!> v2 patch no longer applies to master.
Apologies, forgot to rebase the patch after it was partially committed.
Nonetheless the cfbot seems to have capably rebased the patch already.
> One minor point in the already-committed docs, "Specifies the named group
> to use for TLS key exchange" is singular while a following sentence says
> multiple groups can be specified.
Makes sense. Attached tweaks to "group(s)" across the board.

Evan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Clarify-that-ssl_groups-is-for-any-key-exchange-g.patch text/plain 5.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-08-29 20:10:45 Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560
Previous Message Sehrope Sarkuni 2026-08-29 19:51:58 Re: Assorted Win32 error handling fixes (CreateThread, pgwin32_select, pg_usleep)