Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-09-24 08:06:03
Message-ID: 8efa906c-6722-994d-b66d-8616e34653c7@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 2019-09-17 22:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 2019-09-17 22:12, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> But should we worry about any buildfarm members running old ccache
>>> versions? It'd probably be polite to notify the owners list about
>>> what the minimum ccache version is going to be.
>
>> Buildfarm members are not running coverage, are they?
>
> Ah, of course not. I'd forgotten the details of what we were
> concerned about. Objection withdrawn.

committed

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-09-24 22:20:43 Somebody broke commit hook for git push --tags?
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2019-09-24 06:53:09 Re: Using postgresql.org account as an auth id on third party websites