Re: relhassubclass and partitioned indexes

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: relhassubclass and partitioned indexes
Date: 2018-10-23 00:28:53
Message-ID: 8eda3655-a029-a82c-72c3-5971d57d756f@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/10/23 0:45, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Oct-22, Amit Langote wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2018/10/22 11:09, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 06:46:15PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>>>> Thanks. Attached a patch to set relhassubclass when an index partition is
>>>> added to a partitioned index.
>>>
>>> Thanks, committed after adding a test with ALTER TABLE ONLY, and
>>> checking upgrades as well as ATTACH partition for ALTER INDEX and ALTER
>>> TABLE. In all cases the same code paths are taken.
>>
>> Thank you for committing with those changes. I didn't know about create
>> index on "only".
>
> pg_dump uses it :-)

Aha, I see.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-23 01:43:38 Re: pgsql: Avoid duplicate XIDs at recovery when building initial snapshot
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-10-23 00:19:44 Re: removing unnecessary get_att*() lsyscache functions