Re: Reduce build times of pg_trgm GIN indexes

From: David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reduce build times of pg_trgm GIN indexes
Date: 2026-09-03 07:41:53
Message-ID: 8eda0298-e42d-4867-aba1-77a3b991dbb8@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

>> Thanks for reviewing the patch. Attached is v9 with all reviewing
>> comments from below addressed.
>>
>
> Thanks for updating the patches.

Can you add yourself as reviewer to the commit fest entry? See [1].

> I'm relying on the IDE's auto-formatting, which fixes most coding style issues.
>
> The committer will run pgindent anyway [1] — so I didn't run it beforehand.
That's what I thought. Thanks for the pointer to the committing checklist.

--
David Geier

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6418/.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2026-09-03 07:48:31 Re: SUM(int2)/SUM(int4) do not detect overflow of the int8 accumulator
Previous Message Alexander Nestorov 2026-09-03 07:40:54 Re: gist_trgm_ops '=' operator: planner picks it over btree, ~300x slower