Postgres performance

From:	std pik <stdpik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Postgres performance
Date:	2009-09-28 06:13:40
Message-ID:	8ebb1431-2a09-4022-83b1-7b91e2cf2fca@m11g2000vbl.googlegroups.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2009-09-28 06:13:40 from std pik <stdpik(at)gmail(dot)com>  2009-09-28 14:11:17 from Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>   2009-09-28 21:16:26 from Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>  2009-10-04 11:06:54 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>  2009-10-04 11:08:19 from Gerd Koenig <koenig(at)transporeon(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-performance pgsql-www

Responses

• Re: Postgres performance at 2009-09-28 14:11:17 from Andy Colson
• Re: [PERFORM] Postgres performance at 2009-10-04 11:06:54 from Robert Haas
• Re: Postgres performance at 2009-10-04 11:08:19 from Gerd Koenig

Browse pgsql-performance by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Kouber Saparev	2009-09-28 08:43:00	LIMIT confuses the planner (again)
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2009-09-27 19:17:13	Re: Regarding Sequential Scans count increase each time we press refresh .

Browse pgsql-www by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Magnus Hagander	2009-09-28 09:28:26	Re: Large fixed-width text
Previous Message	Petr Jelinek	2009-09-28 05:33:42	Re: Large fixed-width text