| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints |
| Date: | 2009-07-20 16:24:16 |
| Message-ID: | 8e2dbb700907200924l3cb4ad73g25f398261e98c8b4@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/7/20 David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:21:53AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com> writes:
>> >> * Please move the code that says that it should be in a new file to a
>> >> new file.
>>
>> > Ah yes, I forgot about that. Will do.
>>
>> > utils/adt/constraints.c ?
>>
>> Please, no. Constraints are not a datatype. Do not copy the brain-dead
>> decision that put ri_triggers there.
>
> Does that mean ri_triggers should come out of there?
>
The same argument could be applied to ruleutils.c, trigfuncs.c and perhaps
one or two others.
And if not there, where then?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-07-20 16:32:22 | Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-07-20 16:23:33 | Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic |