Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Manni Wood <manni(dot)wood(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, KAZAR Ayoub <ma_kazar(at)esi(dot)dz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD
Date: 2025-11-18 14:01:00
Message-ID: 8e226753-57af-489a-bfbe-caa23dd71286@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-11-18 Tu 3:04 AM, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 at 01:53, Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025, 07:16 Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I'd like to mark myself as the committer this one, but I noticed that the
>>> commitfest entry [0] has been marked as Withdrawn. Could someone either
>>> reopen it or create a new one as appropriate (assuming there is a desire to
>>> continue with it)? I'm hoping to start spending more time on it soon.
>>>
>>> [0] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5952/
>>
>> I closed this entry because I currently don't have enough time to continue developing this patch. It is fine if someone else reopens it; I will do my best to see the patch whenever I can.
> Thank you for all your work on this patch.
>
> I would like to continue working on this but I am not sure what are
> the correct steps to reopen this commitfest entry. Do I just need to
> change commitfest entry's status to 'Needs review'?

That should do it, I believe.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Geier 2025-11-18 14:06:54 Re: Performance issues with parallelism and LIMIT
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-11-18 14:00:39 Re: make -C src/test/isolation failure in index-killtuples due to btree_gist