Re: simple patch for discussion

From: Greg Hennessy <greg(dot)hennessy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: simple patch for discussion
Date: 2025-07-17 10:45:32
Message-ID: 8e10b5bb-2f00-4a43-80fa-fe89425e79ec@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 at 12:44, Greg Hennessy <greg(dot)hennessy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> workers, but there isn't an easy way to get more
>> workers.
On 7/16/25 11:01 PM, David Rowley wrote:
>> Is "alter table ... set (parallel_workers=N);" not easy enough?

It may be easy enough for one table, but that won't work for joins as
far as I
can tell. I'd like to have more cpu's available in more cases.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-07-17 11:11:05 Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Previous Message Mahendra Singh Thalor 2025-07-17 10:18:48 Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall