| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session |
| Date: | 2023-10-06 11:11:24 |
| Message-ID: | 8dfac374-7440-7f6f-95b2-3ea6c26fb4ee@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04.10.23 20:30, Dave Cramer wrote:
> We need to
> figure out what is the right way to globally identify types, like
> either
> by fully-qualified name, by base name, some combination, how does it
> work with extensions, or do we need a new mechanism like UUIDs. I
> think
> that is something we need to work out, no matter which protocol
> mechanism we end up using.
>
>
> So how is this different than the GUC that I proposed ?
The last patch I see from you in this thread uses OIDs, which I have
argued is not the right solution.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-10-06 11:12:24 | Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-10-06 11:09:01 | Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session |