Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Any big slony and WAL shipping users?

From: "Josh Harrison" <joshques(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Glyn Astill" <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Cc: slony1-general(at)lists(dot)slony(dot)info, "General postgres mailing list" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any big slony and WAL shipping users?
Date: 2007-12-28 17:06:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
Thanks for all your response.
I also thought abt having 2 setups for backup and replication so that even
when slony fails I will always have the standby server (WAL shipping) to
help me out.
 I have another question regarding this. I also want to write these to the
tape. Right now we have a cron job doing level 0,1,2,...  backups of the
other servers to the tape regularly. What is the good way to include
postgres server backup to tape?

On Dec 28, 2007 9:29 AM, Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:

> Hi Josh,
> This is exactly the same setup I'm currently testing. For those
> asking why use both WAL shipping and slony, it's simple; this means
> we have no single point of failure. If slony stops replicating
> because we mess up a replication set or our shipping method (NFS)
> falls on its ass, at least we still have some replication going.
> We have to use slony, like you we need a replica to take the load off
> of our main system, this is mainly for our reporting processes.
> Glyn
> --- Josh Harrison <joshques(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We are trying to use slony and WAL shipping for warm standby for
> > replication
> > with postgresql. Currently our systems are in oracle and we r
> > checking the
> > feasibility to migrate to postgres. Replication is one major issue
> > here.
> > Though everything seems to be working fine in our test environment,
> > we just
> > want the assurance that Slony and WAL shipping is used by other
> > large
> > production systems and running successfully.
> > What are the other large 24x7 productions systems that use slony
> > and the
> > other WAL archiving of postgresql successfully?
> >
> > Thanks
> > josh
> >
>      ___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try
> it
> now.

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Josh HarrisonDate: 2007-12-28 17:23:21
Subject: Applying patch
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-12-28 16:49:42
Subject: Re: double free corruption?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group