From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrien NAYRAT <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Log a sample of transactions |
Date: | 2019-01-18 08:03:18 |
Message-ID: | 8d7efd46-fdc6-06a8-b98b-ef0543047583@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15/01/2019 18:03, Adrien NAYRAT wrote:
> The goal is not to find slow queries in a transaction, but troubleshoot
> applicative issue when you have short queries.
>
> Sometimes you want to understand what happens in a transaction, either
> you perfectly know your application, either you have to log all queries
> and find ones with the same transaction ID (%x). It could be problematic
> if you have a huge traffic with fast queries.
But if you have trouble with a specific transaction, how will a setting
help that randomly logs transactions, not necessarily the one you are
concerned about?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Iwata, Aya | 2019-01-18 08:18:35 | RE: libpq debug log |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-01-18 07:56:25 | Re: proposal - plpgsql unique statement id |