Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases?

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases?
Date: 2017-11-29 23:23:40
Message-ID: 8d6a99b8-4dfb-a52b-4079-eba4bdbda6f9@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/29/2017 05:54 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:

> Yes. That's actually what the autovacuum launcher does. It connects
> using InitPostgres(NULL, InvalidOid, NULL, NULL), and then scans
> pg_database to fetch a list (see get_database_list).

Thanks! It looks like if get_database_list were not static, it
would be just the thing I'm looking for.

Would an SPI query of pg_database also work, in the
bgw-connected-to-null-dbname context? I'm just wondering if
that might be clearer/fewer LOC than just copying the lower-level
approach from get_database_list.

-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-11-29 23:25:58 Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-29 22:54:40 Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases?