Re: BUG #1698: Different behavior in UNIQUE and DISTINCT

From: Mauro Delfino <maurodelfino(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Mauro Delfino <maurodelfino(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1698: Different behavior in UNIQUE and DISTINCT
Date: 2005-06-13 13:12:38
Message-ID: 8d465be205061306124d947056@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Yes I'm sure. I was created right before filling it.
Thanks,
Mauro
2005/6/3, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>:
>
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 20:22:07 +0100,
> Mauro Delfino <maurodelfino(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I have the these two tables:
> > CREATE TABLE table_one
> > ( field1 VARCHAR(255) );
> >
> > CREATE TABLE table_two
> > ( field1 VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE );
> >
> > table_one has 500k records. I certify that all strings are distinct with
> > this query:
> > SELECT DISTINCT field1 FROM table_one;
> > The query results 500k rows.
> >
> > But if I try to insert the records of table_one into table_two with the
> > following command:
> > INSERT INTO table_two (field1) (SELECT field1 FROM table_one);
> > This error occurs:
> > ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "table_two_field1_key"
> >
> > What happened? DISTINC and UNIQUE have different algorithms to determine
> > when two strings are equal?
>
> Are you sure table_two is empty when you do this?
>

--
Mauro Delfino
maurodelfino(at)gmail(dot)com
(48) 9933-6933
(MCDBA/MCSE/MCP+I/IBM Lotus CLS)
Microsoft SQL Server Official Beta Tester

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-13 14:25:01 Re: Bug#311533: Invalid timestamp returned because of timezone
Previous Message tiejun feng 2005-06-13 11:33:47 BUG #1717: using PgOleDb-1.0.0.15 in delphi i can't edit the data in control