From: | Maksim Karaba <Maksim_Karaba(at)epam(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault |
Date: | 2017-09-12 08:35:12 |
Message-ID: | 8c3283ae5f7e4099ba9ef49b7ec413e1@EPBYMINSA0001.epam.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Thanks for pointing to the possible root cause.
Our Dev team finally have figured out what was the reason and fixed it.
The reason was in using postgres_fdw based cursors like
for scr in (select f1, f2 ... from foreign table (postgre_fdw) ) loop
from scr1 in (select .. from foreign table (postgre_fdw) where ... = scr.f1) loop
Compicated update of local table using foreign tables as source
update of foreign table one record /**/
end loop;
end loop;
Dev team has refactored it to use loop based on arrays instead of fdw to reduce time of foreign session
MAKSIM KARABA
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 7:57 PM
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Maksim Karaba <Maksim_Karaba(at)epam(dot)com>; pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you want to push this forward rather than wait for somebody else
>> to hit the problem, you could try adding something like
>>
>> if (fsplan->scan.scanrelid == 0 && outerPlanState(node) == NULL &&
>> (estate->es_plannedstmt->commandType != CMD_SELECT ||
>> estate->es_rowMarks))
>> elog(WARNING, "foreign join plan lacks EPQ support");
>>
>> near the beginning of postgresBeginForeignScan and then running your
>> app on a test server.
> Hmm, is there a reason this cannot be included as a sanity check always?
That's off-the-cuff rather than something I'm sure is correct. But yeah, I was wondering about pushing something like that into the standard code.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-09-12 12:32:12 | Re: Old row version in hot chain become visible after a freeze |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-09-12 08:22:03 | Re: Old row version in hot chain become visible after a freeze |