Re: Proposal: http2 wire format

From: Alvaro Hernandez <aht(at)ongres(dot)com>
To: Damir Simunic <damir(dot)simunic(at)wa-research(dot)ch>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: http2 wire format
Date: 2018-03-26 13:42:39
Message-ID: 8b53c673-6fcc-9640-cc6a-606b0a65d8bf@ongres.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26/03/18 13:11, Damir Simunic wrote:
>> On 26 Mar 2018, at 11:13, Vladimir Sitnikov
>> <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>> Damir> * What are the criteria for getting this into the core?
>> Craig>Mine would be:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> There's a relevant list as well:
>> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/blob/master/backend_protocol_v4_wanted_features.md
>>
>>
>
> This is a great addition to the list, thanks!
>
> Damir
>

    Hi Damir.

    I'm interested in the idea. However, way before writing a PoC,
IMVHO I'd rather write a detailed document including:

- A brief summary of the main features of HTTP2 and why it might be a
good fit for PG (of course there's a lot of doc in the wild about
HTTP/2, so just a summary of the main relevant features and an analysis
of how it may fit Postgres).

- A more or less thorough description of how every feature in current
PostgreSQL protocol would be implemented on HTTP/2.

- Similar to the above, but applied to the v4 TODO feature list.

- A section for connection poolers, as  an auth, as these are very
important topics.

    Hope this helps,

    Álvaro

--

Alvaro Hernandez

-----------
OnGres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-03-26 13:45:01 Re: Re: csv format for psql
Previous Message David Steele 2018-03-26 13:42:08 Re: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.