Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2?

From: Tory M Blue <tmblue(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net>
Cc: Torsten Zühlsdorff <foo(at)meisterderspiele(dot)de>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2?
Date: 2009-10-18 04:08:36
Message-ID: 8a547c840910172108o366058acv2df4f6ed2015ddc1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> Torsten Zühlsdorff wrote:
>
> >
> > I've upgraded all my databases to 8.4. They pain was not so big, the
> > new -j Parameter from pg_restore is fantastic. I really like the new
> > functions around Pl/PGSQL. All is stable and fast.
> >
> > Greetings from Germany,
> > Torsten
>

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net> wrote:

> I am running all my production work on 8.4 at this point; no problems of
> note.
>
> -- Karl
>

Thanks guys, ya running slon , must be replicated so it seems 8.4 is good,
but need to wait for the slon+pg to be good..

Also not real pain? A full dump and restore again, can't see that not being
painful for a DB of any real size.

Thanks for the response guys.

Und Danke Torsten :)

Tory

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl Denninger 2009-10-18 04:13:47 Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2?
Previous Message Karl Denninger 2009-10-18 03:55:43 Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2?