| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Julien Tachoires <julmon(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SUBTRANS: Minimizing calls to SubTransSetParent() |
| Date: | 2022-11-29 13:05:58 |
| Message-ID: | 8a303e46-fc0f-43c8-1066-d57b092b4a52@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/29/22 13:49, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 17:29, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> (yes, the last line shows x10 performance patched, that is not a typo)
>
> New version of patch, now just a one-line patch!
>
> Results show it's still a good win for XidInMVCCSnapshot().
>
I'm a bit confused - for which workload/benchmark are there results?
It's generally a good idea to share the scripts used to run the test and
not just a chart.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Tachoires | 2022-11-29 13:18:01 | Re: SUBTRANS: Minimizing calls to SubTransSetParent() |
| Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2022-11-29 13:05:19 | Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15 |