Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations

From: "Daniel van Ham Colchete" <daniel(dot)colchete(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Date: 2006-12-12 16:58:34
Message-ID: 8a0c7af10612120858g1b1b4454x518a3ed609324627@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Mike,

I'm making some other tests here at another hardware (also Gentoo). I
found out that PostgreSQL stops for a while if I change the -t
parameter on bgbench from 600 to 1000 and I have ~150 tps instead of
~950tps.

I don't know why PostgreSQL stoped, but it was longer than 5 seconds
and my disk IO was comsuming 100% of my CPU time during this period.
And I'm testing with my fsync turned off.

Maybe if you lower your -t rate you are going to see this improvement.

Best regards,
Daniel

On 12/12/06, Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:10:34AM -0200, Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote:
> >are you using "-mtune/-mcpu" or "-march" with GCC?
>
> I used exactly the options you said you used.
>
> >Witch GCC version? Are you working with a 32bits OS or 64bits?
>
> 3.3.5; 32
>
> Mike Stone
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-12-12 17:13:59 Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Previous Message David Boreham 2006-12-12 16:56:02 Re: Low throughput of binary inserts from windows to linux